antimony (antimony) wrote,

ooh, looking at jnanacandra's photos made me remember that I still want to get a really huge print of the "quadrillium" made. (It's a photo of a trillium that was a little bit confused, and has fours everywhere.) The photograph itself is nothing really special (taken with either a 35mm standard snapshot, or *maybe* my dad's nicer 35mm, or possibly my 110, although I don't think I was the one that took the photo, and I may want to crop it -- I haven't looked at it in a few years. What I was going to ask the photography-savvy here is: what sizes can you blow a 35mm photo up to without serious grainy-ness? (I haven't decided if I want to blow it up far enough to go grainy. I might, actually.) And, second -- can this be done at all without the negative? I haven't asked my folks yet if they can find the negative -- they save them, usually, but they don't have all of their old photos.

  • ifcomp: quickies

    Some short impressions of short games (I haven't been having much time/energy to play, but did a bunch of short web games while commuting -- I stuck…

  • IFComp 2019: group 1

    Well, the first batch coming out of the shuffle is Very IFComp. One short-cute parser puzzler, one Dramatic Web Game About Dark Subjects, and an…

  • another year, another IFComp

    Do I post about anything in my actual life? Not really. But I'm going to try to judge IFComp again. There are 82 entries this year; I'm hoping to get…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.